Chain of Command
Commander: Gen Brian. D. Brown
Deputy Commander: VADM Eric T. Olson
Director, Center for Special Operations: LtGen Dell .L. Dailey
Director for Intelligence/J2: COL Dan Daley
In 2005, USSOCOM was directed by the Unified Command Plan to plan, synchronize, and as directed, conduct global operations against terror networks in cooordination with other combatant commanders. Everyday we collaborated, coordinated and planned with other agencies to achieve desired global effects. The most comprehensive element of SOCOM’s synchronization effort was the global collaborative planning process. This effort drew on the other Combatant Command capabilities and expertise to develop DoD’s global war on terror campaign plan.
Other Memories
LOM Award
For exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service as Director of Intelligence Operations Division, Center for Special Operations, United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), MacDi11 Air Force Base, Florida from August 2004 through May 2006. Captain Knight's driving leadership of more than 125 intelligence personnel was directly responsible for the development of three groundbreaking intelligence annexes to Operational and Contingency Plans, clearly establishing USSOCOM as the global intelligence synchronizer. He brilliantly led his Division through six Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) exercises, including several demanding time sensitive planning scenarios that proved critical to articulating USSOCOM' s GWOT roles for intelligence. Additionally, Captain Knight pioneered USSOCOM' s GWOT personnel requirements plan supporting an unprecedented increase of more than 300 personnel critical to USSOCOM's GWOT mission. His superior performance of duties highlights the culmination of 26 years of honorable and dedicated service. Captain Knight' s dynamic direction, keen judgment, and loyal dedication to duty reflected great credit upon him and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
Criteria The Legion of Merit is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States without degree for exceptionally outstanding conduct in the performance of meritorious service to the United States. ... The Legion of Merit is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States without degree for exceptionally outstanding conduct in the performance of meritorious service to the United States. The performance must merit recognition by individuals in a key position which was performed in a clearly exceptional manner. MoreHide
Comments For exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service as Director of Intelligence Operations Division, Center for Special Operations, United States Special Operations Command... For exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service as Director of Intelligence Operations Division, Center for Special Operations, United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), MacDi11 Air Force Base, Florida from August 2004 through May 2006. Captain Knight's driving leadership of more than 125 intelligence personnel was directly responsible for the development of three groundbreaking intelligence annexes to Operational and Contingency Plans, clearly establishing USSOCOM as the global intelligence synchronizer. He brilliantly led his Division through six Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) exercises, including several demanding time sensitive planning scenarios that proved critical to articulating USSOCOM' s GWOT roles for intelligence. Additionally, Captain Knight pioneered USSOCOM' s GWOT personnel requirements plan supporting an unprecedented increase of more than 300 personnel critical to USSOCOM's GWOT mission. His superior performance of duties highlights the culmination of 26 years of honorable and dedicated service. Captain Knight' s dynamic direction, keen judgment, and loyal dedication to duty reflected great credit upon him and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service. MoreHide
Chain of Command
Commanders: LGEN P.V. Hester and LGEN T.C. Waskow
Major staff responsible for the mutual defense of Japan. Supported forward presence of 53,000 military, 4,000 civilians, and 51,000 dependent personnel on mainland Japan and Okinawa. Carried out mission in support of U.S. and bilateral interests in the region.
DSSM Award Captain Lendall S. Knight, United States Navy, distinguished himself by exceptionally superior service while serving as Director of Intelligence, United States Forces, Japan, from July 2001 to August 2004. Captain Knight coordinated United States Forces Japan, Joint Intelligence Center Pacific, Defense intelligence Agency and Japan Defense Intelligence Headquarters participation and completion of a Secretary of Defense-directed Comprehensive Security Assessment for Japan. This bilateral, joint effort characterized the future threat environment in Asia and ensured future national and bilateral policy was based on the latest intelligence assessment for this region. He led the production of over 2,307 Classified Military Information reports for release to Japan, 250 specifically in support of their participation in Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. Captain Knight's actions have ensured the availability of critical intelligence and intelligence support essential to the success of United States and Japanese security here in Japan and throughout the Commander United States Pacific Command area of responsibility. Captain Knight's initiative, foresight and dedication to duty were directly responsible for enhancing and expanding United States-Japan cooperative defense efforts. The singularly distinctive accomplishments of Captain Knight reflect great credit upon himself, the United States Navy, and the Department of Defense.
Criteria The Defense Superior Service Medal is awarded by the Secretary of Defense to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after February 6, 1976, renders superior meritorious service in a ... The Defense Superior Service Medal is awarded by the Secretary of Defense to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after February 6, 1976, renders superior meritorious service in a position of significant responsibility while assigned to a joint activity. MoreHide
Comments Captain Lendall S. Knight, United States Navy, distinguished himself by exceptionally superior service while serving as Director of Intelligence, United States Forces, Japan, from July 2001 to August ... Captain Lendall S. Knight, United States Navy, distinguished himself by exceptionally superior service while serving as Director of Intelligence, United States Forces, Japan, from July 2001 to August 2004. Captain Knight coordinated United States Forces Japan, Joint Intelligence Center Pacific, Defense intelligence Agency and Japan Defense Intelligence Headquarters participation and completion of a Secretary of Defense-directed Comprehensive Security Assessment for Japan. This bilateral, joint effort characterized the future threat environment in Asia and ensured future national and bilateral policy was based on the latest intelligence assessment for this region. He led the production of over 2,307 Classified Military Information reports for release to Japan, 250 specifically in support of their participation in Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. Captain Knight's actions have ensured the availability of critical intelligence and intelligence support essential to the success of United States and Japanese security here in Japan and throughout the Commander United States Pacific Command area of responsibility. Captain Knight's initiative, foresight and dedication to duty were directly responsible for enhancing and expanding United States-Japan cooperative defense efforts. The singularly distinctive accomplishments of Captain Knight reflect great credit upon himself, the United States Navy, and the Department of Defense. MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Criteria The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous ... The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous or meritorious achievement which renders that unit outstanding compared to other units performing similar service, but not sufficient to justify the award of the Navy Unit Commendation. MoreHide
Description The Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) is a mid-level unit award of the United States military which is awarded to any military command which displays exceptionally meritorious conduct in the perform... The Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) is a mid-level unit award of the United States military which is awarded to any military command which displays exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service, heroic deeds, or valorous actions. MoreHide
Criteria The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous ... The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous or meritorious achievement which renders that unit outstanding compared to other units performing similar service, but not sufficient to justify the award of the Navy Unit Commendation. MoreHide
Criteria The Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded for service in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees North latitude and west ... The Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded for service in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees North latitude and west of 68 degrees East longitude, as well as the total land areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Individuals serving between January 17, 1991, and November 30, 1995, in Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Syria, and Jordan (including their air space and territorial waters) are also eligible; however, they must have directly supported combat operations (e.g., embassy guards are not eligible). MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Criteria The U.S. Navy has issued two marksmanship ribbons: the Navy Pistol Marksmanship Ribbon and Navy Rifle Marksmanship Ribbon, since 1920. The pistol ribbon is currently awarded for qualification on the B... The U.S. Navy has issued two marksmanship ribbons: the Navy Pistol Marksmanship Ribbon and Navy Rifle Marksmanship Ribbon, since 1920. The pistol ribbon is currently awarded for qualification on the Beretta 9mm pistol, while the rifle ribbon is currently awarded for qualification on the M14 and M16 assault rifle variants. The Navy issues the marksmanship ribbon in three levels, that of Marksman, Sharpshooter, and Expert. The basic ribbon is awarded for the Marksman level while the specific Marksmanship Device is awarded for qualification as a Sharpshooter or Expert. Those receiving an Expert qualification receive the Marksmanship Medal, in addition to the Marksmanship Ribbon. MoreHide
Comments The U.S. Navy has issued two marksmanship ribbons: the Navy Pistol Marksmanship Ribbon and Navy Rifle Marksmanship Ribbon, since 1920. The pistol ribbon is currently awarded for qualification on the B... The U.S. Navy has issued two marksmanship ribbons: the Navy Pistol Marksmanship Ribbon and Navy Rifle Marksmanship Ribbon, since 1920. The pistol ribbon is currently awarded for qualification on the Beretta M9 9mm pistol, while the rifle ribbon is currently awarded for qualification on the M14 and M16 assault rifle variants.[1]
The Navy issues the marksmanship ribbon in three levels â?? that of Marksman, Sharpshooter, and Expert. The basic ribbon is awarded for the Marksman level while the specific Marksmanship Device is awarded for qualification as a Sharpshooter or Expert.
MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
MSM Award
For outstanding meritorious service as Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces, Japan from September 1999 to July 2001. Commander Knight consistently performed his demanding duties in an exemplary and highly professional manner. He demonstrated superior leadership and outstanding initiative, significantly improving support to the Regional Commanders by authoring and instituting the Intelligence Contingency cell concept of operations which increased the level of reporting to national agencies more than 150 percent. This concept greatly strengthened U.S. Navy Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force bilateral relations through the precise management of 1 1 separate special programs and the establishment of a Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Intelligence Liaison billet. He consistently met the difficult challenges head-on with diplomacy, foresight and positive cando attitude, always ensuring excellent results. By his exceptional professional ability, personal initiative, and total dedication to duty, Commander Knight reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
Criteria The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a... The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a degree that would warrant the award of the Legion of Merit. MoreHide
Comments "For outstanding meritorious service as Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces, Japan from September 1999 to July 2001. Commander Knight consistently performed his dem... "For outstanding meritorious service as Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces, Japan from September 1999 to July 2001. Commander Knight consistently performed his demanding duties in an exemplary and highly professional manner. He demonstrated superior leadership and outstanding initiative, significantly improving support to the Regional Commanders by authoring and instituting the Intelligence Contingency cell concept of operations which increased the level of reporting to national agencies more than 150 percent. This concept greatly strengthened U.S. Navy Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force bilateral relations through the precise management of 1 1 separate special programs and the establishment of a Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Intelligence Liaison billet. He consistently met the difficult challenges head-on with diplomacy, foresight and positive cando attitude, always ensuring excellent results. By his exceptional professional ability, personal initiative, and total dedication to duty, Commander Knight reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service. " MoreHide
Criteria The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service... The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service during the current War on Terrorism. In addition, all members of the National Guard and Reserve who were part of the Selected Reserve in good standing between August 2, 1990, to November 30, 1995, are eligible for the National Defense Service Medal. In the case of Navy personnel, Midshipment attending the Naval Academy during the qualifying periods are eligible for this award, and Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) Midshipmen ae only eligible if they participated in a summer cruise that was in an area which qualified for a campaign medal. MoreHide
Description
The National Defense Service Medal is authorized for CAPT Knight for the following time periods: Persian Gulf War (Aug 2, 1990 - Nov 30, 1995) and Global War on Terrorism (Sep 11, 2001 - present).
Criteria Individuals authorized the award of this medal must have participated in or served in support of Global War on Terrorism operations on or after September 11, 2001 and to a future date to be determined... Individuals authorized the award of this medal must have participated in or served in support of Global War on Terrorism operations on or after September 11, 2001 and to a future date to be determined. MoreHide
Description On active duty from 2001 to 2006 (USFJ J2 and USSOCOM J2 staff) supporting GWOT.
The Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOT-S) is a military award of the United States military which was created b... On active duty from 2001 to 2006 (USFJ J2 and USSOCOM J2 staff) supporting GWOT.
The Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOT-S) is a military award of the United States military which was created by Executive Order 13289 on March 12, 2003 by President George W. Bush. The award recognizes those military service members who have performed service in the War on Terror from September 11, 2001, to a date yet to be determined.
To receive the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, a military service member must perform duty in a designated anti-terrorism operation for a period of either 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days of duty. For those who were engaged in combat, killed, or wounded in the line of duty the time requirement is waived.[5][6]
The initial authorized operation for the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal was the so-called "Airport Security Operation" which occurred between September 27, 2001 and May 31, 2002. Additional operations, for which the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal is authorized, include the active military campaigns of Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Noble Eagle, and Operation Iraqi Freedom.[5] Future operations are at the discretion of United States component commanders upon approval from the United States Department of Defense.[6]
MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Chain of Command
Commanders: RADM D.L. Brewer III and RADM S.G. Smith
Mission included: Commander Amphibious Task Force (CATF) and Commander Maritime Prepositioning Force (CMPF)
A maritime prepositioning force (MPF) operation is the rapid deployment and assembly of a Marine air-ground task force (MAGTF) in a secure area using strategic airlift and cforward-deployed maritime prepositioning ships (MPSs). An MPF operation is a mission-tailored, strategic deployment option that is global in nature, naval in character, and suitable for various employment. Maritime prepositioning provides a combatant commander with deployment flexibility and an increased capability to respond rapidly to a crisis or contingency with a credible force. The essential purpose of an MPF operation is to establish a MAGTF fully prepared to execute an employment mission.
The CMPF is identified in the operation initiating directive, and has OPCON of all MSC and NAVFORassigned to the MPF, except those NAVFOR attached to the MAGTF. The CMPF and staff originate from a standing Navy organization complete with C2 capabilities; e.g., amphibious groups, amphibious squadrons or NBGs. Responsibilities follow: Coordinate the establishment oañ FH with the FH program manager if the MPF mission so requires; Coordinate airlift of NSEs with the MAGTF commander; Coordinate time-phased arrival of MPF elements and control measures within the AAA with the MAGTF commander; Designate the seaward security officer (SSO); Coordinate termination of the MPF operation with the MAGTF commander.
Other Memories
COMPHIBGRU 3 assumed role of CMPF in Exercise Native Fury in Kuwait (1998) and Exercise Freedom Banner in Korea.
Established a Mobile Intelligence Center (MIC) to provide direct supprt to Commander Maritime Prepositioning Force (CMPF), the Mobile Inshore Undersea Warfare (MIUW) Unit and Landward Security Officer (LSO). The MIC was an "all source" organization with full SIGINT, HUMINT and Counterintelligence capabilities which complemented the capabilities of the MIUW Unit Radar Sonar Surveillance Center (RSSC). MIC personnel routinely briefed CMPF, Inshore Boat Units (IBU), and Port Security Units (PSU) assigned to a Naval Inshore Undersea Warfare Group 1 (redesignated Naval Coastal Warfare Group 1 in 1988).
Life on MPF duty involved living and working in tents set up in ports on along shorelines for extended periods of time.
MSM Award
For meritorious service while serving as Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence at Amphibious Group THREE from December 1997 to August 1999. Commander Knight performed his duties in an exemplary and highly professional manner. Displaying exceptional skill and resourcefulness, he spearheaded groundbreaking improvements in Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence technologies on board all Pacific Fleet amphibious ships. He enhanced Force intelligence readiness with the development of the prototype Mobile Intelligence Center and Secure Mobile Local Area Network serving as the model for the architecture employed by THIRD Fleet's Intelligence Readiness Center, His diligent efforts dramatically improved intelligence support to Maritime Prespositioning Force operations during two contingency operations in the FIFTH Fleet Area of Responsibility. Additionally, he assembled and led a diverse team Of technical experts and analysts in publishing insightful items of interest to the entire Naval Intelligence community, By his exceptional professional ability, personal initiative, and total dedication to duty, Commander Knight reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
Criteria The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a... The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a degree that would warrant the award of the Legion of Merit. MoreHide
Comments '"For meritorious service while serving as Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence at Amphibious Group THREE from December 1997 to August 1999. Commander Knight performed his duties in an exemplary ... '"For meritorious service while serving as Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence at Amphibious Group THREE from December 1997 to August 1999. Commander Knight performed his duties in an exemplary and highly professional manner. Displaying exceptional skill and resourcefulness, he spearheaded groundbreaking improvements in Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence technologies on board all Pacific Fleet amphibious ships. He enhanced Force intelligence readiness with the development of the prototype Mobile Intelligence Center and Secure Mobile Local Area Network serving as the model for the architecture employed by THIRD Fleet's Intelligence Readiness Center, His diligent efforts dramatically improved intelligence support to Maritime Prespositioning Force operations during two contingency operations in the FIFTH Fleet Area of Responsibility. Additionally, he assembled and led a diverse team Of technical experts and analysts in publishing insightful items of interest to the entire Naval Intelligence community, By his exceptional professional ability, personal initiative, and total dedication to duty, Commander Knight reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service." MoreHide
Criteria The Navy Expeditionary Medal is awarded to Navy personnel who have landed on foreign territory and engaged in operations against armed opposition or who have operated under circumstances deemed to mer... The Navy Expeditionary Medal is awarded to Navy personnel who have landed on foreign territory and engaged in operations against armed opposition or who have operated under circumstances deemed to merit special recognition and for which no campaign medal has been awarded. MoreHide
Description Foal Eagle is a combined field training exercise (FTX) conducted annually by the Republic of Korea Armed Forces and the United States Armed Forces under the auspices of the Combined Forces Command. ItFoal Eagle is a combined field training exercise (FTX) conducted annually by the Republic of Korea Armed Forces and the United States Armed Forces under the auspices of the Combined Forces Command. It is one of the largest military exercises conducted annually in the world. Foal Eagle has been a source of friction with the government of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and domestic ROK critics.
Foal Eagle is an exercise conducted by the US and ROK armed forces, consisting of rear area security and stability operations, onward movement of critical assets to the forward area, special operations, ground maneuver, amphibious operations, combat air operations, maritime action group operations and counter special operations forces exercises (CSOFEX).
The United Nations Command informs the North Korean People's Army that South Korea and the United States will be conducting the exercise. The United Nations Command also reassured the Korean People's Army at general officer-level talks that these exercises, conducted annually in or around March, are purely defensive in nature[citation needed] and have no connection to ongoing or current events. The Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission monitors the exercise for violations of the Korean Armistice Agreement.
Since 2001, Foal Eagle combined with the annual American-South Korean Reception, Staging, Onward movement, and Integration (RSOI) combined exercises, with RSOI being renamed Key Resolve in 2008.... More
Memories Foal Eagle is a combined Field Training Exercise (FTX) conducted annually by the Republic of Korea AFoal Eagle is a combined Field Training Exercise (FTX) conducted annually by the Republic of Korea Armed Forces and the United States Armed Forces under the auspices of the Combined Forces Command. It is one of the largest military exercises conducted annually in the world. While defensive in nature and conducted primarily as a rear area security and stability training exercise, Foal Eagle has been a source of friction with the government of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and domestic ROK critics.
The primary purpose of Foal Eagle is to demonstrate South Korean-U.S. military resolve to deter war on the Korean peninsula and to improve the combined and joint operational posture of those forces. Foal Eagle is a purely defensive exercise which tests the capability of South Korea to defend itself, assisted by the U.S. Armed Forces, and it is also primarily a rear area security and stability operations, onward movement of critical assets to the forward area, special operations, ground maneuver, amphibious operations, combat air operations, maritime action group operations and counter special operations forces exercises (CSOFEX).
Exercise Freedom Banner is an annual 3rd Marine Expeditionary ForceUnited States Marine Corps exercise that is performed with rotating partner countries throughout the Pacific Rim. It involves the movement of Maritime Propositioning Force shipping and associated combat forces into the Korean theater of operations in support of exercises.
Description U.S. Navy and Marine Corps expeditionary forces tested their ability to operate in the littoral and project combat power ashore during "Exercise KERNEL BLITZ '99."
KERNEL BLITZ included two experimentU.S. Navy and Marine Corps expeditionary forces tested their ability to operate in the littoral and project combat power ashore during "Exercise KERNEL BLITZ '99."
KERNEL BLITZ included two experiments, one technology demonstration and a major amphibious landing exercise. The exercise consisted of three phases that began March 10 and concluded April 30.
More than 15 ships and 12,000 Sailors and Marines from southern California participated in the exercise under the overall direction of VADM Dennis V. McGinn, commander, Third Fleet, and LGEN Bruce B. Knutson Jr, commanding general, First Marine Expeditionary Force.
... More
Memories KERNEL BLITZ is a bi-annual Commander-in-CHIEF Pacific (CINCPAC) fleet training exercise (FLEETEX) fKERNEL BLITZ is a bi-annual Commander-in-CHIEF Pacific (CINCPAC) fleet training exercise (FLEETEX) focused on operational/tactical training of Commander, Third Fleet (C3F)/ I Marine Expeditionary Forces (MEF) and Commander, Amphibious Group 3 (CPG-3)/ 1ST Marine Division (MARDIV). KERNEL BLITZ is designed to enhance the training of Sailors and Marines in the complexities of brigade-size amphibious assault operations.... More
Description The Marines conducted a 30-day exercise called NATIVE FURY from mid-May through mid-June 1998 in Kuwait. It was a five-phase operation over a two-week period that included downloading approximately 40The Marines conducted a 30-day exercise called NATIVE FURY from mid-May through mid-June 1998 in Kuwait. It was a five-phase operation over a two-week period that included downloading approximately 400 pieces of Marine Prepositioned Equipment from an MPS ship. During Native Fury '98 in May 1998, the Diego Garcia-based Vehicle Cargo Ship, Corporal Louis J. Hauge, successfully transferred amphibious assault vehicles, 155mm. howitzers, and M-1 battle tanks, among other items, to the shore. This represented the first large-scale landing of major items of equipment undertaken since the 1990-91 Gulf War. Native Fury '98 included a field training exercise, live fires, and a command post exercise. The purpose of the exercise was to download portions of the MPS, bring in Marines to fall in on the equipment, and then conduct FTXs and CPXs in support of DESERT THUNDER.
... More
Memories
From 1995 to 1998 COMPHIBGRU 3 assumed role of Commander Maritime Prepositioning Force (CMPF) in Exe
From 1995 to 1998 COMPHIBGRU 3 assumed role of Commander Maritime Prepositioning Force (CMPF) in Exercise Native Fury in Kuwait (1998) and Exercise Freedom Banner in Korea. CPG3 had been nationally tasked to prepare to deploy to Kuwait in support of an impending mission to locate and destroy weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. At the last minute the order was cancelled so CPG3 deployed under exercise taskng.
As the N2 for CPG3, established a Mobile Intelligence Center (MIC) to provide direct supprt to Commander Maritime Prepositioning Force (CMPF), the Mobile Inshore Undersea Warfare (MIUW) Unit and Landward Security Officer (LSO). The MIC was an "all source" organization with full SIGINT, HUMINT and Counterintelligence capabilities which complemented the capabilities of the MIUW Unit Radar Sonar Surveillance Center (RSSC). MIC personnel routinely briefed CMPF, Inshore Boat Units (IBU), and Port Security Units (PSU) assigned to a Naval Inshore Undersea Warfare Group 1 (redesignated Naval Coastal Warfare Group 1 in 1988).
Life on MPF duty involved living and working in tents set up in ports on along shorelines for extended periods of time.
We operated from Kuwait Naval Base that had been heavily bombed when US Forces drove Iraq from Kuwait during Desert Storm.
I travelled the local area with an assigned Counter Intelligence officer.
I visited and extensively photographed an Indian Kashin destroyer that made a portcall nearby.
Best Friends
LTC Tom Fish (USA), CDR Uchiyama (JMSDF), LCDR Maeda, LT Sekiguchi (JMSDF)
Best Moment
Obtaining a personal tour of the submarine construction shipyard in Kobe then commandeering a ferry for a personal survey tour of Kobe port.
Riding in the side-car Harley in the Black Ship Festival parade through the narrow streets of Shimoda lined with 10s of 1000s of flag-waving and cheering Japanese!Â
Personal chats with Amb "Fritz" Mondale either driving or flying down to the aircraft carrier USS Independence in Yokosuka. He gave me his personal account of Operation Eagle Claw (failed Iranian Hostage Rescue attempt) while he was in the oval office with President Carter.
Worst Moment
Briefing misplacing the American Ambassador's greeting (speech) I was to give in Japanese at the opening ceremony for the Japan Triathalon Union (JTU) event in Osaka. I had stored it my Navy cover but saw that it was missing when I took it off in the ride to the convention center. The driver got me back to the hotel and there is was laying on the lobby floor. I gave the 8-minute greeting speech in a large hall with more than 1000 in attendance! The American Embassy supported 4 JTU events annually in different cities; JTU specifically requested the naval attaches give the greeting because they liked the "choker white" uniform! After the opening ceremony I would go off with the city dignitaries for a lavish dinner. The next morning I would get to shoot the starting gun then tour the local area sights and later present trophies at the finish/awards ceremony.
Â
Chain of Command
AMB: Walter Mondale
DCM: Rust Deming
POLMIL: Dave Shear
USFJ: LTGEN Richard Meyers; Deputy CDR USFJ: MGEN Peter Pace
DATTs: CAPT Fitzgerald and CAPT George R. ("Randy") McWilliams
AIRAs: COL Ritter and COL Rider
ARMAs: COL Jack Pritchart and LTC Mike Libby (acting)
AARMAs: LTC Mike Libby and LTC Tom Fish
ANAVA: CDR Bud Brown (predecessor); CDR Mark Ward (relief)
DMSM Award
Commander Lendall S. Knight, United States Navy, distinguished himself by exceptionally meritorious service as Assistant Naval Attache, United States Defense Attache Office, Tokyo, Japan, Defense Intelligence Agency from September 1994 to October 1997. Widely recognized as an expert in Japanese Naval Matters, Commander Knight made essential contributions to the important United States-Japan relationship through his professionalism, expertise, and devotion to duty. Played a key role in the United States-Japan security and intelligence relationship during a time of great turmoil, he routinely facilitated bilateral cooperation through his access to senior Japanese officials, and his in depth understanding of the United States-Japan relationship. His uniformly exemplary service during this assignment elevated the influence of the Defense Intelligence Agency on Japan's long term defense intelligence goals. His highly focused efforts and significant results have earned plaudits for the Defense Attache Office, and made an important contribution to United States Navy and Defense Intelligence Agency objectives in Japan. Through his distinctive accomplishments, Commander Knight reflects great credit upon himself, the United States Navy, and the Department Defense.
Criteria The Defense Meritorious Service Medal is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces who, while serving in a joint activity, distinguish themselves by noncombat outs... The Defense Meritorious Service Medal is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces who, while serving in a joint activity, distinguish themselves by noncombat outstanding achievement or meritorious service, but not of a degree to warrant award of the Defense Superior Service Medal. MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Best Friends
Westpac IO Cruise http://www.navybuddies.com/cruisebooks/cv61-93/index_005.htm
Best Moment
USS Ranger Final Cruise (1 Aug 1992 - 31 January 1993); Westpac, IO and Persian Gulf
50th Anniversary Doolitllte Raid Re-enactment
Russian Hormone landing on Ranger
Chain of Command
CCDG 1: RADM W.J. Hancock
CCDG 1 N2: CDR Stephen Jayjock
Constellation CO: Dennis V. McGinn
CVIC officer: LCDR Jack Dorsett
CVW IO: CDR Peter Hull
Other Memories
As the Assistant CRUDESGRU Intelligence Officer I oversaw the renovation of USS Ranger's Supplementary Plot (SUPPLOT) and managed this space together with LCDR Al Pollard (Cryptologist) during Ranger's final cruise.
The function of SUPPLOT is to gather indications and warning (I&W) information and pass it quickly to the pertinent warfare commander(s). It is not physically located within CVIC. SUPPLOT can be thought of as an afloat information correlation center. SUPPLOT provides tactical indications and warning, intelligence support to the ship, air wing, embarked CARGRU/CRUDESGRU staff, and to the composite warfare commanders. SUPPLOT serves as a focal point and fusion center for all-source operational intelligence information. The information is derived from organic intelligence sensors as well as from intelligence assets from outside the battlegroup (e.g., national assets). The combined warfare commander uses this fused intelligence in combination with information from other battlegroup assets to determine a course of action.
NCM Award
For meritorious service while serving as Assistant Flag Intelligence Officer on the staff of Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group ONE from June 1991 to March 1993. Lieutenant Commander Knight consistently performed his demanding duties in an exemplary and highly professional manner. Seizing the initiative, Lieutenant Commander Knight designed and supervised the implementation of numerous highly significant additions and changes to tactical and intelligence data processors which greatly enhanced the accuracy and timeliness ofcritical information flow. Lieutenant Commander Knight developed the tactical reconnaissance plan for the initial stages of Operation RESTORE HOPE and created unique, special-purpose scenarios for major Battle Group and Fleet exercises. His initiative, diligence and resourcefulness inspired all who observed him and contributed significantly to the successful mission accomplishment of the RANGER Battle Group. Lieutenant Commander Knight's professionalism and devotion to duty reflected great credit upon himself and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
Criteria The Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal may be awarded to service members who, while serving in any capacity with the Navy or Marine Corps, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievem... The Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal may be awarded to service members who, while serving in any capacity with the Navy or Marine Corps, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievement or meritorious service (but not of sufficient nature to warrant a higher decoration). MoreHide
Comments "For meritorious service while serving as Assistant Flag Intelligence Officer on the staff of Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group ONE from June 1991 to March 1993. Lieutenant Commander Knight consisten... "For meritorious service while serving as Assistant Flag Intelligence Officer on the staff of Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group ONE from June 1991 to March 1993. Lieutenant Commander Knight consistently performed his demanding duties in an exemplary and highly professional manner. Seizing the initiative, Lieutenant Commander Knight designed and supervised the implementation of numerous highly significant additions and changes to tactical and intelligence data processors which greatly enhanced the accuracy and timeliness ofcritical information flow. Lieutenant Commander Knight developed the tactical reconnaissance plan for the initial stages of Operation RESTORE HOPE and created unique, special-purpose scenarios for major Battle Group and Fleet exercises. His initiative, diligence and resourcefulness inspired all who observed him and contributed significantly to the successful mission accomplishment of the RANGER Battle Group. Lieutenant Commander Knight's professionalism and devotion to duty reflected great credit upon himself and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service. " MoreHide
Criteria The Joint Meritorious Unit Award is presented in the name of the Secretary of Defense to Joint Activities of the Department of Defense for meritorious achievement or service, superior to that which is... The Joint Meritorious Unit Award is presented in the name of the Secretary of Defense to Joint Activities of the Department of Defense for meritorious achievement or service, superior to that which is normally expected, under one of the following conditions: During action in combat with an armed enemy of the United States, For a declared national emergency or Under extraordinary circumstances that involve the national interest. MoreHide
Description Dec 1992 - Ranger BG participation in Operation Restore Hope.
I was assigned as the Assistant Intelligence Officer on CCDG-1 staff. CCDG-1, embarked on USS Ranger, sortied from the Persian Gulf where... Dec 1992 - Ranger BG participation in Operation Restore Hope.
I was assigned as the Assistant Intelligence Officer on CCDG-1 staff. CCDG-1, embarked on USS Ranger, sortied from the Persian Gulf where it had been conducting operations in support of Southern Watch to the coast of Somalia as Restore Hope began. The mission was to conduct flight operations in support on U.N. forces, specifically to provide indications and warning of Somalia rebel ground forces threatening relief operations. A special projects P-3 aircraft out of Rota Spain was dispatched to Djibouiti to support the operation. Having had a tour in VQ-1 Det Atsugi, I was very familiar with VPU squadron capabilities. I briefed the Admiral and N2 how they could be employed and then wrote the Oporder to make it happen. Flying out of Djibouiti the P-3 would have limited onstation time so the Oporder included landing priority at Mogadishu where their collection film would be then be shuttled by helo to the ARG offshore for developing and analysis then shuttled back ashore in support of the HQ ashore. I think this may have been the first instance where an a P-3 operated overland in support of ground troops.
The Ranger Battle Group was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and Joint Meritorious Unit Medal for participation in Commander Joint Task Force executing Operation Restore Hope.
Criteria The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Natio... The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Nations or friendly foreign nations MoreHide
Description
Operation Restore Hope (7-15 Dec; Somali ops) while assigned as Assistant Intelligence Officer on CCDG-1 staff onboard USS Ranger.
Criteria The Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded for service in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees North latitude and west ... The Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded for service in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees North latitude and west of 68 degrees East longitude, as well as the total land areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Individuals serving between January 17, 1991, and November 30, 1995, in Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Syria, and Jordan (including their air space and territorial waters) are also eligible; however, they must have directly supported combat operations (e.g., embassy guards are not eligible). MoreHide
Description Operation Southern Watch Sep-Dec 1992 assigned to CCDG-1 onboard USS Ranger. Southwest Asia Cease-fire Campaign.
The Southwest Asia Service Medal (SASM) is a military award of the United States Armed ... Operation Southern Watch Sep-Dec 1992 assigned to CCDG-1 onboard USS Ranger. Southwest Asia Cease-fire Campaign.
The Southwest Asia Service Medal (SASM) is a military award of the United States Armed Forces which was created by order of President George H.W. Bush on March 12, 1991. The award is intended to recognize those military service members who performed duty during the years of the Persian Gulf War. The medal was designed by Nadine Russell of the Army's Institute of Heraldry.[1][2]
Individuals awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal must have participated in or supported military operations in Soutwest Asia between August 2, 1990 and November 30, 1995. That period of inclusion includes participation in Operations Desert Shield or Desert Storm. To receive the award, a service member must be: attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground/shore military operations; attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations; actually participating as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations in the areas designated; or serving on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days, except, if a waiver is authorized for personnel participating in actual combat. One bronze service star will be worn for participation in each designated campaign. Each recipient of the medal should wear at least one campaign star.
While several operations occurred in the geographical areas described above between April 12, 1991, and November 30, 1995, including Operation Provide Comfort (June 1, 1992 �?? November 30, 1995), Operation Southern Watch (August 27, 1992 �?? April 29, 2003) and Operation Vigilant Warrior (October 14, 1994 �?? December 21, 1994), these operations were covered under the third campaign, Southwest Asia Cease-Fire. Service in Operations that extended beyond the final campaign date of November 30, 1995 were recognized by awards of either the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal or the Armed Forces Service Medal.
MoreHide
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Description
Assigned CCDG-1 onboard USS Ranger for WESPTAC Cruise.
Description Operation Southern Watch was an air-centric military operation conducted by the United States Department of Defense from Summer 1992 to Spring 2003.
United States Central Command's Joint Task Force SOperation Southern Watch was an air-centric military operation conducted by the United States Department of Defense from Summer 1992 to Spring 2003.
United States Central Command's Joint Task Force Southwest Asia (JTF-SWA) had the mission of monitoring and controlling the airspace south of the 32nd Parallel (extended to the 33rd Parallel in 1996) in southern and south-central Iraq during the period following the end of the 1991 Gulf War until the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Operation Southern Watch began on 27 August 1992 with the stated purpose of ensuring Iraqi compliance with United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 (UNSCR 688) of 5 April 1991, which demanded that Iraq "immediately end this repression and express the hope in the same context that an open dialogue will take place to ensure that the human and political rights of all Iraqi citizens are respected." Nothing in the resolution spelled out the Iraqi no-fly zones or Operation Southern Watch.
Iraqi bombing and strafing attacks against the Shi’ite Muslims in Southern Iraq during the remainder of 1991 and during 1992 indicated Saddam Hussein chose not to comply with the resolution. Forces from Saudi Arabia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France participated in Operation Southern Watch. The commander of JTF-SWA, an aeronautically rated United States Air Force (USAF) Major General, assisted by an aeronautically designated United States Navy (USN) Rear Admiral, reported directly to the Commander, United States Central Command (USCENTCOM).
Military engagements in Southern Watch occurred with regularity, with Coalition aircraft routinely being shot at by Iraqi air defense forces, though they were usually only reported in the Western press occasionally. An intensification was noted prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, though it was said at the time to just be in response to increasing activity by Iraqi air-defense forces. It is now known that this increased activity occurred during an operation known as Operation Southern Focus.... More
Memories Ranger BG awarded Southwest Asia Medal for participation.
Operation Southern Watch was a military oRanger BG awarded Southwest Asia Medal for participation.
Operation Southern Watch began on 27 August 1992 with the stated purpose of ensuring Iraqi compliance with United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 of 5 April 1991, which demanded that Iraq "immediately end this repression and express the hope in the same context that an open dialogue will take place to ensure that the human and political rights of all Iraqi citizens are respected." Nothing in the resolution spelled out the Iraqi no-fly zones or Operation Southern Watch.
Military engagements in Southern Watch occurred with regularity, with Coalition aircraft routinely being shot at by Iraqi forces, though they were usually only reported in the press occasionally. An intensification was noted prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, though it was said at the time to just be in response to increasing activity by Iraqi air-defense forces. It is now known that this increased activity occurred during an operation known as Operation Southern Focus.
Description The Operation Restore Hope was an operation of the United States and many of its allied countries in Somalia. The operation was protected by the United Nations. The United States was the leader of thiThe Operation Restore Hope was an operation of the United States and many of its allied countries in Somalia. The operation was protected by the United Nations. The United States was the leader of this operation. Somalia was in civil war and many people were dying from hunger in this country. The goal of this operation was creating suitable conditions and calming down the situation in Somalia for helping the Somali people who needed food in the southern part of this country.
After the killing of several Pakistani peacekeepers, the Security Council ordered the allied forces by the Resolution 837, that they can do anything for sending the humanitarian aid to the Somalian people in accordance to Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. This operation was successful.... More
Memories
I was assigned as the Assistant Intelligence Officer on CCDG-1 staff. CCDG-1, embarked on USS Range
I was assigned as the Assistant Intelligence Officer on CCDG-1 staff. CCDG-1, embarked on USS Ranger, sortied from the Persian Gulf where it had been conducting operations in support of Southern Watch to the coast of Somalia as Restore Hope began. The mission was to conduct flight operations in support on U.N. forces, specifically to provide indications and warning of Somalia rebel ground forces threatening relief operations. A special projects P-3 aircraft out of Rota Spain was dispatched to Djibouiti to support the operation. Having had a tour in VQ-1 Det Atsugi, I was very familiar with VPU squadron capabilities. I briefed the Admiral and N2 how they could be employed and then wrote the Oporder to make it happen. Flying out of Djibouiti the P-3 would have limited onstation time so the Oporder included landing priority at Mogadishu where their collection film would be then be shuttled by helo to the ARG offshore for developing and analysis then shuttled back ashore in support of the HQ ashore. I think this may have been the first instance where an a P-3 operated overland in support of ground troops.
The Ranger Battle Group was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and Joint Meritorious Unit Medal for participation in Commander Joint Task Force executing Operation Restore Hope.
Chain of Command
DET OICs: LCDR Jim Russell and LCDR Bill Clark
VQ-1 Guam N2: CDR Rose Levitre
Other Memories
Reported to VQ-Det Atsugi just before the holidays and immediately went to work because the person who I was relieving was on leave. The Soviet Navy was conducting an operation that we have been directed to fly on so without any indoctrination on the various intelligence computer systems I read the message boards and covered the maps on the briefing walls with post-its. I made my introduction to the aircrew when they arrived around 4am for their briefing, the first of near daily events for the next three years. I typically would arrive at the office by midnight, do all-source fusion, put together the brief and present to SIGINT aircrew by 5am, then flight follow the mission until relieved by the debriefer between noon and 1pm. Between Soviet exercises, special collection missions, US Exercises and US carrier battle group transits there were very few down periods until Operation Desert Shield (defense of Saudi Arabia) in 1992.
During Operation Desert Shield all the VQ planes/crew shipped out to Kuwait. I deployed to Kuwait from Sep - Dec 1990 supporting Operation Desert Shield. In Jan 1991 Desert Storm kicked off. out there. VQ was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Award for Operation Desert Shield.
In 1991 the squadron closed its permanent detachment in Atsugi, Japan after 30 years and moved it to Misawa, Japan
In 1990, fellow Arab Gulf states refused to endorse Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's plan to cut production and raise the price of oil, leaving him frustrated and paranoid. Iraq had incurred a mountain o
In 1990, fellow Arab Gulf states refused to endorse Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's plan to cut production and raise the price of oil, leaving him frustrated and paranoid. Iraq had incurred a mountain of debt during its war with Iran that had lasted for most of the previous decade, and the Iraqi President felt that his Arab brothers were conspiring against him by refusing to raise oil prices. Therefore, after weeks of massing troops along the Iraq-Kuwait border and accusing Kuwait of various crimes, Hussein sent seven divisions of the Iraqi Army into Kuwait in the early morning hours of 2 August 1990. The invasion force of 120,000 troops and 2,000 tanks quickly overwhelmed Iraq's neighbor to the south, allowing Hussein to declare, in less than a week, that Kuwait was his nation's nineteenth province. The United Nations responded quickly, passing a series of resolutions that condemned the invasion, called for an immediate withdrawal of Iraqi troops from Kuwait, imposed a financial and trade embargo on Iraq, and declared the annexation void.
Regarding Iraq's actions as a threat to a vital interest of the US, namely the oil production capability of the Persian Gulf region, President George Bush ordered warplanes and ground forces to Saudi Arabia after obtaining King Fahd's approval. Iraqi troops had begun to mass along the Saudi border, breaching it at some points, and indicating the possibility that Hussein's forces would continue south into Saudi Arabia's oil fields. Operation DESERT SHIELD, the US military deployment to first defend Saudi Arabia grew rapidly to become the largest American deployment since the Southeast Asia Conflict. The Gulf region was within US Central Command's (CENTCOM) area of responsibility. Eventually, 30 nations joined the military coalition arrayed against Iraq, with a further 18 countries supplying economic, humanitarian, or other type of assistance.
Carriers in the Gulf of Oman and the Red Sea responded, US Air Force interceptors deployed from bases in the United States, and airlift transports carried US Army airborne troopers to Saudi Arabia. Navy prepositioning ships rushed equipment and supplies for an entire marine brigade from Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean to the gulf. During the next six months the United States and its allies built up a powerful force in the Arabian peninsula. The navy also began maritime intercept operations in support of a US-led blockade and United Nations sanctions against Iraq.
Coalition forces, specifically XVIII Airborne Corps and VII Corps, used deception cells to create the impression that they were going to attack near the Kuwaiti boot heel, as opposed to the "left hook" strategy actually implemented. XVIII Airborne Corps set up "Forward Operating Base Weasel" near the boot heel, consisting of a phony network of camps manned by several dozen soldiers. Using portable radio equipment, cued by computers, phony radio messages were passed between fictitious headquarters. In addition, smoke generators and loudspeakers playing tape-recorded tank and truck noises were used, as were inflatable Humvees and helicopters.
On 17 January 1991, when it became clear that Saddam would not withdraw, Desert Shield became Desert Storm.
... More
People You Remember
LTJG Paul Morris
Memories The Gulf War (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991), codenamed Operation Desert Shield (2 August 1990 – The Gulf War (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991), codenamed Operation Desert Shield (2 August 1990 – 17 January 1991) for operations leading to the buildup of troops and defense of Saudi Arabia and Operation Desert Storm (17 January 1991 – 28 February 1991) in its combat phase, was a war waged by coalition forces from 34 nations led by the United States against Iraq in response to Iraq's invasion and annexation of Kuwait.
I deployed to Manama, Bahrain from NAF Atsugi with a VQ-1 World Watcher EP3 detachment from September to December 1990. On arrival I asked the intel officer of the det we were relieving, "What happens if the flagship gets underway?" to which he said it would never happen. BS! No sooner did I board USS Lasalle that I learned she was getting underway the next week! We needed to find a secure facility fast or we'd be sleeping on the plane with the classified gear. In addition to supporting the daily flights I jumped through my butt to coordinate, submit all the paperwork and gain navy approval to establish at temporary secure compartmented facility (T-SCIF) at the American Embassy to support our operations. The chain of command back in Japan and Guam was quick to express their displeasure that I was moving Det operations off the flagship and went as far as to send me opnotes directing me to return to the flagship! They eventually got it. Our T-SCIF wasn't much larger than a closet to stow the classified and secure comms through the embassy to get the mission reports out. And most important, it was a whole lot better than the alternative of sleeping on the plane with the classified gear. The Det personnel bedded down at a four-star hotel in town, ate at the local restaurants and shopped for carpets, gold and perfumes at the souk. I made it back to NAF Atsugi just before Christmas. Having debriefed Desert Shield operations to the commander CTF72 and CFAIRWESTPAC, I was invited to fly down to the Phillipines with them to brief the Ranger CVBG (commanded by RADM Zlatoper) which was enroute the Persian Gulf for Desert Storm. I then went stateside for the holidays and on a returning stopover in Honolulu CNN reported that DS operations had commenced. A new American Embassy had been completed in Bahrain and the VQ Det eventually took over the old embassy building in its entirety.
Deployed VQ-1 personnel qualified for the Southwest Asia Medal and Kuwait Liberation Medal for Operation Desert Shield. ... More
Criteria The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service... The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service during the current War on Terrorism. In addition, all members of the National Guard and Reserve who were part of the Selected Reserve in good standing between August 2, 1990, to November 30, 1995, are eligible for the National Defense Service Medal. In the case of Navy personnel, Midshipment attending the Naval Academy during the qualifying periods are eligible for this award, and Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) Midshipmen ae only eligible if they participated in a summer cruise that was in an area which qualified for a campaign medal. MoreHide
Description The National Defense Service Medal is authorized for CAPT Knight for the following time periods:
Persian Gulf War (Aug 2, 1990 - Nov 30, 1995) and Global War on Terrorism (Sep 11, 2001 - present).
The N... The National Defense Service Medal is authorized for CAPT Knight for the following time periods:
Persian Gulf War (Aug 2, 1990 - Nov 30, 1995) and Global War on Terrorism (Sep 11, 2001 - present).
The National Defense Service Medal is a service medal of the United States Armed Forces established by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1953. The medal was first intended to be a "blanket campaign medal" awarded to service members who served honorably during a designated time period of which a "national emergency" had been declared during a time of war or conflict. It may also be issued to active military members for any other period that the Secretary of Defense designates.
Currently, the National Defense Service Medal is the oldest "service medal" in use by the United States Armed Forces.
The National Defense Service Medal is authorized for CAPT Knight for the following time periods:
Persian Gulf War (Aug 2, 1990 - Nov 30, 1995) and Global War on Terrorism (Sep 11, 2011 - present)
Additional awards of the National Defense Service Medal are authorized for members of the military who served in more than one of the eligible time periods; such additional awards are denoted by bronze service stars.
MoreHide
Criteria The Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded for service in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees North latitude and west ... The Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded for service in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees North latitude and west of 68 degrees East longitude, as well as the total land areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Individuals serving between January 17, 1991, and November 30, 1995, in Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Syria, and Jordan (including their air space and territorial waters) are also eligible; however, they must have directly supported combat operations (e.g., embassy guards are not eligible). MoreHide
Description The Gulf War (2 August 1990 - 28 February 1991), codenamed Operation Desert Shield (2 August 1990 - 17 January 1991) for operations leading to the buildup of troops and defense of Saudi Arabia and Ope... The Gulf War (2 August 1990 - 28 February 1991), codenamed Operation Desert Shield (2 August 1990 - 17 January 1991) for operations leading to the buildup of troops and defense of Saudi Arabia and Operation Desert Storm (17 January 1991Â - 28 February 1991) in its combat phase, was a war waged by coalition forces from 34 nations led by the United States against Iraq in response to Iraq's invasion and annexation of Kuwait.
I deployed to Manama, Bahrain from NAF Atsugi with a VQ-1 World Watcher EP3 detachment from September to December 1990. On arrival I asked the intel officer of the det we were relieving, "What happens if the flagship gets underway?" to which he said it would never happen. BS! No sooner did I board USS Lasalle that I learned she was getting underway the next week! We needed to find a secure facility fast or we'd be sleeping on the plane with the classified gear.  In addition to supporting the daily flights I jumped through my butt to coordinate, submit all the paperwork and gain navy approval to establish at temporary secure compartmented facility (T-SCIF) at the American Embassy to support our operations.  The chain of command back in Japan and Guam was quick to express their displeasure that I was moving Det operations off the flagship and went as far as to send me opnotes directing me to return to the flagship!  They eventually got it. Our T-SCIF wasn't much larger than a closet to stow the classified and secure comms through the embassy to get the mission reports out. And most important, it was a whole lot better than the alternative of sleeping on the plane with the classified gear. The Det personnel bedded down at a four-star hotel in town, ate at the local restaurants and shopped for carpets, gold and perfumes at the souk. I made it back to NAF Atsugi just before Christmas. Having debriefed Desert Shield operations to the commander CTF72 and CFAIRWESTPAC, I was invited to fly down to the Phillipines with them to brief the Ranger CVBG (commanded by RADM Zlatoper) which was enroute the Persian Gulf for Desert Storm. I then went stateside for the holidays and on a returning stopover in Honolulu CNN reported that DS operations had commenced. A new American Embassy had been completed in Bahrain and the VQ Det eventually took over the old embassy building in its entirety.
VQ-1 qualified for the Southwest Asia Medal for Operation Desert Shield.
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Criteria Awarded to members of the Military Coalition who served in support of Operation Desert Shield or Desert Storm in one or more of the following areas between 2 August 1990 and 31 August 1993: Persian Gu... Awarded to members of the Military Coalition who served in support of Operation Desert Shield or Desert Storm in one or more of the following areas between 2 August 1990 and 31 August 1993: Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees north latitude and west of 68 degrees east longitude, as well as the total land areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. MoreHide
Description I deployed to Manama, Bahrain from NAF Atsugi with a VQ-1 World Watcher EP3 detachment from September to December 1990. On arrival I asked the intel officer of the det we were relieving, "What happ... I deployed to Manama, Bahrain from NAF Atsugi with a VQ-1 World Watcher EP3 detachment from September to December 1990. On arrival I asked the intel officer of the det we were relieving, "What happens if the flagship gets underway?" to which he said it would never happen. BS! No sooner did I board USS Lasalle that I learned she was getting underway the next week! We needed to find a secure facility fast or we'd be sleeping on the plane with the classified gear.  In addition to supporting the daily flights I jumped through my butt to coordinate, submit all the paperwork and gain navy approval to establish at temporary secure compartmented facility (T-SCIF) at the American Embassy to support our operations.  The chain of command back in Japan and Guam was quick to express their displeasure that I was moving Det operations off the flagship and went as far as to send me opnotes directing me to return to the flagship!  They eventually got it. Our T-SCIF wasn't much larger than a closet to stow the classified and secure comms through the embassy to get the mission reports out. And most important, it was a whole lot better than the alternative of sleeping on the plane with the classified gear. The Det personnel bedded down at a four-star hotel in town, ate at the local restaurants and shopped for carpets, gold and perfumes at the souk. I made it back to NAF Atsugi just before Christmas. Having debriefed Desert Shield operations to the commander CTF72 and CFAIRWESTPAC, I was invited to fly down to the Phillipines with them to brief the Ranger CVBG (commanded by RADM Zlatoper) which was enroute the Persian Gulf for Desert Storm. I then went stateside for the holidays and on a returning stopover in Honolulu CNN reported that DS operations had commenced. A new American Embassy had been completed in Bahrain and the VQ Det eventually took over the old embassy building in its entirety.
BACKGROUND:
The Kuwait Liberation Medal was approved by the Kuwait Council of Ministers for award in five classes, generally according to the rank of the recipient. The medal was offered by the Chief of Staff of the Kuwait Armed Forces on July 16, 1994.
A nation of seafarers and ship builders, Kuwait chose as their coat of arms, the traditional dhow. Falconry is the sport of Kings in the Persian Gulf, and the falcon in the arms is seen as a symbol of Kuwaiti prowess. The official symbolism of the colors is that black symbolizes battlefields, white is for deeds, green is for the meadows, and red is for the blood of Kuwait's enemies.
The US accepted only the fifth grade version for all personnel.
Criteria: Awarded to members of the Military Coalition who served in support of Operation Desert Shield or Desert Storm in one or more of the following areas between 2 August 1990 and 31 August 1993: Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees north latitude and west of 68 degrees east longitude, as well as the total land areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. To be eligible,[2] a service member must have been:[3]
(1) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground/shore (military) operations;(2) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations;(3) actually participating as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations in the areas designated above;(4) serving on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days. These time limitations may be waived for members participating in actual combat operations.
The Government of Kuwait offered the Kuwait Liberation Medal to members of the Armed Forces of the United States by letter dated 16 July 1994. The medal was accepted by Secretary of Defense William J. Perry per memorandum dated 16 March 1995.
The Kuwait version of the Kuwait Liberation Medal is considered junior in precedence to the Saudi Arabian version of the medal.
Fifth Class[edit]
Medal: A Bronze medal with enamel, 1 9/16 inches (40 mm) in diameter suspended from a bar by a wreath. The obverse bears the Coat of Arms of the State of Kuwait. The Coat of Arms consists of the shield of the flag design in color superimposed on a falcon with wings displayed. The falcon supports a disk containing a sailing ship with the full name of the State written at the top of the disk. At the top of the medal is the inscription "1991 LIBERATION MEDAL" in Arabic letters. The reverse side is the map of Kuwait on a rayed background.
Ribbon: The ribbon is the pattern of the flag of the State of Kuwait and consists of three equal stripes 29/64 inch (11.5 mm) each of the following colors: Old Glory Red 67156; White 67101; and Irish Green 67189. A black trapezium is at the top of the ribbon drape and service ribbon.
Intended for non-commissioned personnel.
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Criteria This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty ... This ribbon is awarded to officers and enlisted personnel of the Navy, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps, and Marine Corps Reserve for 12 months consecutive or accumulated duty at overseas shore-based duty stations. Each Service has distinct criteria that delineates eligibility; Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units follow Marine Corps policy, and vice-versa. MoreHide
Description VQ-1 Det Atsugi, Japan.
ribbon is awarded to any member of the Navy or Marine Corps who completes one year of consecutive or cumulative duty at a permanent overseas duty station. Additional awards of ... VQ-1 Det Atsugi, Japan.
ribbon is awarded to any member of the Navy or Marine Corps who completes one year of consecutive or cumulative duty at a permanent overseas duty station. Additional awards of the Navy and Marine Corps Overseas Service Ribbon are denoted by service stars. MoreHide
Description Team Spirit was a joint military training exercise of United States Forces Korea and the Military of South Korea held between 1976 and 1993. The exercise was scheduled from 1994 to 1996 but cancelled Team Spirit was a joint military training exercise of United States Forces Korea and the Military of South Korea held between 1976 and 1993. The exercise was scheduled from 1994 to 1996 but cancelled in each year as part of diplomacy to encourage the Government of North Korea to disable the North Korean nuclear weapons program. The North Korea regime abandoned talks following the January 1986 Team Spirit exercises, and in late 1992, North Korea unilaterally withdrew from the South-North High-Level Talks on the pretext of the 1993 Team Spirit exercise.
Until 2007 the exercise had been called "Reception, Staging, Onward Movement and Integration of Forces" (RSOI). As of March 2008, it is called Key Resolve. North Korea has denounced the joint military exercise as a "war game aimed at a northward invasion."... More
Memories
EXPEDITIOUSLY PLANNED, COORDINATED AND FLAWLESSLY EXECUTED INTELLIGENCE AND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT FOR
EXPEDITIOUSLY PLANNED, COORDINATED AND FLAWLESSLY EXECUTED INTELLIGENCE AND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT FOR VQ-I'S PARTICIPATION IN TEAM SPIRIT 88. ORGANIZED AND CHAIRED PRE-EXERCISE WORKING GROUP MEETING BETWEEN COMSEVENTHFLEET AND COMCARGRU SEVEN STAFF, NEATICC AND SQUADRON REPRESENTATIVES. PRESENTED COMPREHENSIVE BRIEF TO ALL MISSIONAIRCREW. CITED. COMMUNICATED AND RESOLVED NUNEROUS INTEROPERABILITY ISSUES THROUGHOUT EXERCISE. COORDINATED THE SUCCESSFUL DEMONSTRATION OF PROVIDING TACTICAL INDICATIONS AND WARNING TO THE BATTLE GROUP VIA SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS. LATER NOTED BY CCG STAFF AS A "CLASS ACT."
Best Moment
NORPAC Cruise (Sep-Oct 1987)
Vancouver, BC (12-16 Sep) - Expo '86
Anchorage, Alaska (26-29 Sep) - first carrier visit
Seattle, WA (12-16 Oct) - 211th Navy Birthday
Chain of Command
Commander Carrier Group 7 - RADM Lyle F Bull - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyle_F._Bull
Chief of Staff - George W Emery (Springvale, Maine) - http://www.paulauger.com/halloffame/inductees/Emery.html
CCG 7 N2 - CDR Joe Mazzafro, LCDR Dean Whetstine (Asst), LCDR Mark Greer (Asst)
USS Constellation (CV-64) - CAPT Melvin D Munsinger & CAPT Philip Anselmo
CVIC: CDR T.G. Goode, LCDR Mike Noll, LT B.T. Murphy, LTJG J.R. Cugini, ISC Kowalsky
Commander Air Wing 14 (CVW-14) : CDR "Buz" Johnson and CDR "Denny" W. Irelan
Other Memories
WESTPAC Cruise (11 Apr - 13 Oct 1987)
Subic Bay, Phillipines 2-8 May); Diego Garcia (19-24 May); Diego Garcia (29 May - June 12); Diego Garcia (15-21 June); Perth, Australia (7-14 Sep); Subic Bay (21-25 Sep); Pearl Harbor (6-7 Oct)
Connie BG conducted air operations in support of Operation Earnest Will, the escorting of re-flagged Kuwaiti tankers in the Persian Gulf as a result of Iranian attacks against international shipping. As a result, the crew of the battlegroup was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for their service.
Also, was first BG to conduct flying at anchor ("FLANKER") operations.
As the Airwing (or Commander Air Group) Intelligence Officer (CAG AI), I managed and led the efforts of the squadron intelligence intelligence officers in the carrier intelligence center's (CVIC) Mission Planning section.
CVIC provides the embarked air wing with the capability to process and analyze collected information rapidly, combine it with other tactical intelligence, and correlate this data with other information in the database. The CVIC can generate mission planning material for the embarked commander and air intelligence briefing and planning materials. The main mission planning areas of support are flight operations and strike support. Individual functions within mission planning generally fall into two categories: photographic reconnaissance and strike mission planning. The CVIC mission planning area provides pilots with an area to prepare for upcoming missions. Here the pilot and intelligence officer will find all the tools and intelligence data required for planning the mission. All pre-mission intelligence briefings are given from CVIC and disseminate out to the individual squadron ready rooms over the Secure Closed Circuit Television System (SCCTV). Post-flight debriefings are also conducted either in this area or some other specially designated area.
Awarded the Navy Achievement Medal for the integration of the Tactical Aircraft Mission Planning System (TAMPS) into CVIC support operations.
Criteria The Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces in the grades of lieutenant commander (or major) and below. It is awarded for meritorious service or achieveme... The Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces in the grades of lieutenant commander (or major) and below. It is awarded for meritorious service or achievement in either combat or noncombat based on sustained performance or specific achievement of a superlative nature but which does not warrant a Navy Commendation Medal or higher. It may not be awarded for service involving participation in aerial flight after January 1, 1969. MoreHide
Comments LT Knight Managed timely and successful integration of Tactical Aircraft Mission Planning System (TAMPS) planning evolutions on board USS CONSTELLATION enabling immediate response to JCS tasking. Qui... LT Knight Managed timely and successful integration of Tactical Aircraft Mission Planning System (TAMPS) planning evolutions on board USS CONSTELLATION enabling immediate response to JCS tasking. Quickly familiarized himself with all system and data base functions. Developed, published administered air wing intelligence training program. Conducted qualitative revision of data base. Awarded Navy Achievement Medal for his thoroughness in setting TAMPS integrated into the CV/CVW Intel and mission planning process.
TAMPS
The Tactical Aircraft Mission Planning System (TAMPS) is a computer-based method for weapons planning and optimizing mission routes against hostile targets. TAMPS is employed extensively by embarked Navy and Marine Corps mission planners to achieve information superiority for the dominant maneuver force of naval tactical aviation. TAMPS provides a common automated system for rapidly processing large quantities of digitized terrain, threat and environmental data, aircraft, avionics, and weapon systems parameters that assist in the precision engagement of enemy forces. The system has an intended capability to meet the tactical mission planning and digital data upload requirements of fixed and rotary wing aircraft, standoff weapons, avionics systems mission support systems and unmanned air vehicles. MoreHide
Criteria The Navy Expeditionary Medal is awarded to Navy personnel who have landed on foreign territory and engaged in operations against armed opposition or who have operated under circumstances deemed to mer... The Navy Expeditionary Medal is awarded to Navy personnel who have landed on foreign territory and engaged in operations against armed opposition or who have operated under circumstances deemed to merit special recognition and for which no campaign medal has been awarded. MoreHide
Criteria The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Natio... The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Nations or friendly foreign nations MoreHide
Description During Apr - Oct 1987 cruise Connie conducted air operations in support of Operation Earnest Will, the escorting of re-flagged Kuwaiti tankers in the Persian Gulf as a result of Iranian attacks agains... During Apr - Oct 1987 cruise Connie conducted air operations in support of Operation Earnest Will, the escorting of re-flagged Kuwaiti tankers in the Persian Gulf as a result of Iranian attacks against international shipping. As a result, the crew of battlegroup was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for their service MoreHide
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Description
CVW-14 onboard USS Constellation for WESTPAC Cruise.
Description Operation Earnest Will (24 July 1987 – 1 August 1990) was the American military protection of Kuwaiti-owned tankers from Iranian attacks in 1987 and 1988, three years into the Tanker War phase of the Operation Earnest Will (24 July 1987 – 1 August 1990) was the American military protection of Kuwaiti-owned tankers from Iranian attacks in 1987 and 1988, three years into the Tanker War phase of the Iran–Iraq War. It was the largest naval convoy operation since World War II.
The U.S. Navy warships that escorted the tankers, part of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, were the operations' most visible part, but U.S. Air Force AWACS radar planes provided surveillance and U.S. Army special-operations helicopters hunted for possible attackers.
Other U.S. Navy vessels participated in Operation Earnest Will. They were then under the command of the U.S. Navy's Seventh Fleet which had primary responsibility for combat operations in the Persian Gulf region. The numerous ships used in Operation Earnest Will mostly consisted of Battleship Battle Groups, Carrier Battle Groups, Surface Action Groups and ships from the Pacific's Third and Seventh Fleets and the Mediterranean-based Sixth Fleet. They generally operated in and near the Gulf for parts of their normal six-month deployments.
This was the first tactical operation of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) that involved Navy SEALs, Special Boat Units, and 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Airborne) ("Nightstalkers") aviators all working together.... More
Memories
I was attached to CVW 14 onboard USS Constellation just having inchopped the Indian Ocean when we we
I was attached to CVW 14 onboard USS Constellation just having inchopped the Indian Ocean when we were sortied to the North Arabian Sea to begin Operation Earnest Will. The U.S. Navy began Operation Earnest Will at 2:00 a.m. (EST) on 23 July 1987. USS Crommelin, USS Fox, USS Worden, USS Kidd, and USS Klakring were the first U.S. Navy ships assigned to escort the Kuwaiti oil tankers. Our battlegroup ships escorted reflagged tankers through the Straits of Hormuz while our aircraft (E2C Hawkeyes and F-14 Tomcats) flew cover support for EP3 SIGINT planes flew an intelligence collection track above and through the straits and back out again.
The Connie Battle Group was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for the operation.
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Description
CVW-14 onboard USS Constellation. NORPAC Cruise.
Chain of Command
Commanding Officer: CDR J. Lerner
Other Memories
In the spring 1985 while assigned to FICPAC at Pearl Harbor I explored the idea of pursuing employment in the civilian sector. I attended a "Career Seminars" briefing in Waikiki and interviewed with a recruiter who suggested I would be very marketable for a position in "brand management." Over the next few days Career Seminars helped me draft a resume, gave me practice interivews and arranged for me to interview with the VP for Personnel and a senior employee (former navy) of Richardson Vicks Inc (RVI) who, along with a dozen other Fortune 500 companies, was participating the Career Seminars recruiting event in Honolulu. CS gave me two great tips just prior to the interview: no matter who asks the question look both in the eyes when you answer and don't forget to mention golf, both men are crazy about it! I nailed the interview and by the time I got back to my residence in Waipio I had an invitation to visit RVI Headquarters back in Wilton, CT for follow-up interviews. I submitted my navy resignation notice to my CO at FICPAC, CAPT Jeremy Clark, who informed me that I would be back just as ADM Bobby Ray Inman had after a brief sojourn into the civilian sector.
I made the trip east within the next few weeks and interviewed with other companies across the country along the way. I eventually accepted an offer from RVI, so impressive that the President of CS and his wife flew out to Honolulu to take my wife and me out to dinner! My FICPAC farewell was one evening on the North Shore in May and we travelled to CT where I started with RVI. Within a couple of months RVI was acquired by Proctor & Gamble and I made a phone call to my old XO, now CO, of FICPAC CAPT Ilmar Krasts. He said "damn it Lenny, we told you would be back! Get your paperwork in. The transfer/redisignation board meets next week!" I later learned that I was the only officer taken back into active service that year. Being a "black sheep" (having broken service) I thought I was destined for a non-descript assignment but to my surprise I was ordered to the CAG AI (Carrier Air Group Air Intelligence Officer) for CVW-14 onboard USS Constellation in San Diego! Great job in a great location! The sexy life of a "yuppy" (young urban professional) was no longer a mystery; the navy was way more exciting and worthwhile!
During the period of my broken service July to December 1985 I drilled one weekend a month with a FIRSTEURLANT Unit on Long Island.
Chain of Command
Commanding Officers: CAPT R.F. Dipalma and CAPT Jeremy C. Clark
Fleet Intelligence Center Pacific (FICPAC) is a shore
activity located at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, under the administra-
tive control of Commander in Chief U.S. Pacific Fleet
(CINCPACFLT).
The mission of the Fleet Intelligence Center Pacific, as
set forth in CINCPACFLTINST 5450. 1M, is to develop an
intelligence processing and production capability which is
immediately available to support U.S. Naval Forces in the
Pacific and Indian Ocean areas assigned to USPACOM for defense
responsibility; to provide those forces with the intelligence
materials necessary to carry out efficiently their respective
missions; to maintain sufficient qualified and trained
intelligence personnel for assignment to peacetime and wartime
augmentation requirements; to provide direct support and
assistance to CINCPACFLT which will enable that command to
fulfill its requirements for nuclear weapons employment and
planning; and, to perform such other functions as may be
directed by CINCPACFLT.
SUPPORT DEPARTMENT (1 DEPARTMENT) . The Support Department
provides services necessary for the planning and coordination of
all matters relating to the general administration of the
command. The department is comprised of the Graphics Division
(11), Administrative/Security Division (13), Document Support
Division (14), Supply Division (15), and the First
Lieutenant/Maintenance Division (1C).
INTELLIGENCE PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT (2 DEPARTMENT) . The
Intelligence Production Department includes Naval Analysis,
Strike Warfare, Amphibious Support, Current Exploitation, Soviet
Naval Analysis, Naval Special Warfare Support, Collection
Management, Data Base Management, and Decentralized Processing
and Interpretation Center (D-PIC) Divisions. The mission of the
department is to provide all-source intelligence, with emphasis
on imagery interpretation and analysis. Production includes
both current intelligence and basic encyclopedic production in
support of fleet, theater, and national consumers.
INTELLIGENCE DATA SYSTEMS (3 DEPARTMENT) . The Intelligence
Data Systems Department provides systems analysis, programming,
and ADP operations support to FICPAC intelligence analysts and
to the operating forces of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.
The department operates two independent computer
centers. GENSER materials are produced on an IBM 4341 system
which is used to reformat the NIPS data base for fleet use in
both magnetic and microfiche format. The department also runs a
system high Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) PDP 11/70, which
provides access for FICPAC intelligence analysts to local and
remote data bases.
In addition to the computer centers, the department also
operates a complete microfiche production facility, an informa-
tion center and maintains a full complement of systems analysts,
systems application and data base programmers.
Other Memories
Initially buried in the ADP Department in the basement writing code to do NIPS database pulls. That was difficult coming off two exciting operational cruises. Let my frustrations be known and was given the Soviet Pacific Fleet Branch for analysis and production which I really enjoyed. Went to a corporate recruiting event in Honolulu one day and ended up getting out of the Navy in May 1985 to go work for Richardson Vicks Inc (Oil of Olay, Nyquil, Sinex, VapoRub) in Wilton, CT. I drilled in USNR on Long Island and came back on active duty in Dec 1985 with orders to CVW-14 as the Airwing Intelligence Officer to deploy aboard USS Constellation.
Loved the day job hours at FICPAC. Allowed me to take up surfing and get my golf handicap down to a solid 8.
FICPAC received the Joint Meritorious Unit Award while I was assigned.
Criteria The Joint Meritorious Unit Award is presented in the name of the Secretary of Defense to Joint Activities of the Department of Defense for meritorious achievement or service, superior to that which is... The Joint Meritorious Unit Award is presented in the name of the Secretary of Defense to Joint Activities of the Department of Defense for meritorious achievement or service, superior to that which is normally expected, under one of the following conditions: During action in combat with an armed enemy of the United States, For a declared national emergency or Under extraordinary circumstances that involve the national interest. MoreHide
Description FICPAC received this award during the time I served there.
The Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA) is a military award that was established on June 4, 1981 by Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger and... FICPAC received this award during the time I served there.
The Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA) is a military award that was established on June 4, 1981 by Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger and was implemented by Department of Defense Directive 1348.27 dated July 22, 1982. The Joint Meritorious Unit Award was made retroactive to January 23, 1979.
The Joint Meritorious Unit Award is the only ribbon award granted by the Department of Defense and is the organizational equivalent of the Defense Superior Service Medal. It is awarded to joint units or activities where the joint activity must either report through Unified, Combined, or Specified Command channels or pursue a joint mission under the cognizance of the Secretary of Defense; the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; the commander of a Unified, Specified or Combined Command that is also a joint command; or the Secretary of a military department that has been designated the Executive Agent for the Secretary of Defense.
The first organization to receive the Joint Meritorious Unit Award was the "Electronic Warfare During Close Air Support Joint Test Force" and was awarded the decoration on September 30, 1982.
The Joint Meritorious Unit Award is a ribbon, enclosed in a gold frame. The ribbon is very similar to the Defense Superior Service Medal, indicative of the fact that the service performed would warrant the award of the medal to an individual. Subsequent decorations of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award are annotated with oak leaf clusters.
MoreHide
Best Moment
The Portcalls -
Ft Lauderdale, FL - befriended an older man that took Skipper Roberson and several squadron buddies out on his boat running the intercoastal waterway all day.
St Thomas VI - Festival and Skipper Teagues pool party where I showed with two cute stewardesses.
Port Louis, Mauritius - befriending a family who gave me a wonderful tour of the island and culture
Nassau, Bahamas - befriending a family who gave me a wonderful tour of NYC prior to going on cruise.
Perth, Australia - dancing at The Underground and toga party
20 Jan 1981 - Release of American hostages held in Tehran since Nov 1979 allowing us to proceed to our first port call, Perth, Australia.
Chain of Command
Indian Ocean / Med Cruise (Nov 1980 - June 1981)
Carrier Group Eight (CCG 8) - RADM James E. "Snake" Service
CCG 8 N2: CDR W.D. Poellnitz & LT R.E. Marshall (Asst)
USS Independence (CV-62) - CAPT Thomas E. Shannahan
CVIC - CDR J.E. Davis, LCDR J.E. Newman, LT J.D. Stewart, ENS R.A. Bozo
Airwing Six (CVW 6) - CDR T.W. Wright (CAG), LT Larry Danforth (CVW IO)
- Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron 122 (VAW-122) - CDR "Rock" B. Teague
- Squadrons: 2x VF F4, 1x VA A6, 2x A7, VAQ EA6, VS S3,VFP RF8, VQ EA3, HS SH3
- Cruisebook http://www.navybuddies.com/cruisebooks/cv62-81/212.htm
July 1980 - NAS Key West Det - Provided AEW for USS Lexington conducting carrier quals for newly winged aviators out of Pensacola. The "threat" was MIGs out of Cuba. Drove down from NAS Norfolk so I'd have transportation over the two-week period. Stood in the back of the O'club one night listening to instructor "pep talk" to aviators before their first carrier landings the next day. Watched the "green flash" at sunset after with the town after drinks at Sloppy Joe's (Earnest Hemmingway) and enjoyed a day of snorkeling with squadron mates. The barracuda were 3-4 feet long!
Med Cruise (June - Dec 1982)
CCG 8 - RADM Jerry Tuttle, LCDR Bob Marshall (Asst N2)
Independence - CAPT Jerry Breast (CO)
CVIC - CDR E.M. Wied, LCDR C.T. Mauro, ENS Larry Ash, ENS Bill Ullman
CVW 6 - CDR Lair (CAG), LT Tom Curfs (CVW IO)
VAW 122 - CDR Bart Gohmann (CO)
Squadrons: 2x VF F14, 1x VA A6, 2x VFA FA18, VAQ EA6, VS S3, VQ EA3, HS SH3
Cruisebook http://www.navybuddies.com/cruisebooks/cv62-82/index_033.htm
Other Memories
Just prior to my first carrier catapult launch in an E-2C Hawkeye (Hummer). I was in the far aft seat (ACO position) just underneath the escape (ditching) hatch. It would be my responsibility to open the hatch should the emergency bell sound. My commanding officer, CDR "Rock" Teague, was in the seat in front of me and as we were taxing on the flight deck to hook into the catapult he turned to me and screemed to me over the ICS (radio) "Lenny, you just heard three bells sound, what do you do?" I replied "Open the hatch" reaching up and attempting to do just that; it wouldn't budge. I was mortified. "Rock" gave me this huge laugh while turning forward and yelling "We're good! Launch'em" A split second later I was pinned back in my seat due to the G's of the launch while hearing Rock and three other crew screaming "We're all gonna die!" as we careened down the deck. Another second later the Gs were gone, it was quiet and we were airborne. Lenny had just "lost his cherry." The cherry is a small metal device that holds the launching aircraft in place ("in tension") as full power is applied to the aircraft engines. When the pilot completes his final safety check and salutes the deck launch officer the cherry is broken allowing the catapult to "pull" (launch) the aircraft down the deck
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Description
Assigned to VAW-122. Med Cruise onboard USS Independence.
Description President Reagan, saying that an agreement had been reached to end the crisis in west Beirut, ordered about 800 marines today to participate in a three-nation force to insure the safe evacuation of PaPresident Reagan, saying that an agreement had been reached to end the crisis in west Beirut, ordered about 800 marines today to participate in a three-nation force to insure the safe evacuation of Palestinian and Syrian fighters from the city.
In his televised statement from the White House, Mr. Reagan said the successful carrying out of the two-week phased evacuation, which is to begin Saturday, would ''set the stage'' for the rapid departure of all foreign troops -Israeli, Syrian and Palestinian - from the rest of Lebanon and for the restoration of Lebanese control over the country. He said it would also help to safeguard northern Israel from attacks from Lebanon.
''We must also move quickly in the context of Camp David,'' the President said, ''to resolve the Palestinian issue in all its aspects, as well as the other unresolved problems in the Arab-Israeli conflict. Only when all these steps are accomplished can true and lasting peace and security be achieved in the Middle East.''
Mr. Reagan, noting that the lengthy negotiations had been ''extremely complex'' and held under ''the most arduous circumstances,'' often as Israeli bombs were falling on west Beirut, said that sometimes ''it was difficult to imagine how agreement could be reached, and yet it has been reached.'' ... More
The U.S. Multinational Force (USMNF) operated in Beirut, Lebanon from 25 August 1982 to 26 February 1984. During this period four different MAUs served as peacekeepers. The terrorist bombing of the US
The U.S. Multinational Force (USMNF) operated in Beirut, Lebanon from 25 August 1982 to 26 February 1984. During this period four different MAUs served as peacekeepers. The terrorist bombing of the US Marines barracks became a quintessential exemplar of the conditions under which military intervention may not be effective.
Israeli-Palestinian fighting in July 1981 was ended by a cease-fire arranged by U.S. President Ronald Reagan's special envoy, Philip C. Habib, and announced on July 24, 1981. The cease-fire was respected during the next 10 months, but a string of incidents, including PLO rocket attacks on northern Israel, led to the 06 June 1982, Israeli ground attack into Lebanon to remove PLO forces. Israeli forces moved quickly through south Lebanon, encircling west Beirut by mid-June and beginning a three-month siege of Palestinian and Syrian forces in the city.
Throughout this period, which saw heavy Israeli air, naval, and artillery bombardments of west Beirut, Ambassador Habib worked to arrange a settlement. In August 1982, he was successful in bringing about an agreement for the evacuation of Syrian troops and PLO fighters from Beirut. The agreement also provided for the deployment of a three-nation Multinational Force (MNF) during the period of the evacuation, and by late August 1982, U.S. Marines, as well as French and Italian units, had arrived in Beirut. On 10 August 1982 the alert posture of the Mediterranean Amphibious Ready Group was heightened in light of a likely deployment as part of a peacekeeping force to oversee the evacuation of Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) forces from West Beirut.
The 32d Marine Amphibious Unit (MAU) from Camp Lejeune deployed to Beirut to oversee the safe departure of thousands of Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) fighters out of the war-torn city. On 24 August (EDP), the first of 800 Marines began going ashore at Beirut as part of a joint U.S.-French peacekeeping force. When the evacuation ended, these units departed. On 8 September, following the removal of the PLO forces from West Beirut, the Marines redeployed aboard the MARG ships. The US Marines left on 10 September 1982.
In spite of the invasion, the Lebanese political process continued to function, and Bashir Gemayel was elected President in August, succeeding Elias Sarkis. On September 14, however, Bashir Gemayel was assassinated. On 15 September 1982, Israeli troops entered west Beirut. During the next three days, Lebanese militiamen massacred hundreds of Palestinian civilians in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in west Beirut. Bashir Gemayel's brother, Amine, was elected President by a unanimous vote of the parliament. He took office 23 September 1982.
MNF forces returned to Beirut at the end of September 1982 as a symbol of support for the government. On 22 September 1982, following the Phalangist Christian force massacre of Palestinians in the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps, the Mediterranean Amphibious ready Group was ordered to the Eastern Mediterranean. President Ronald Reagan ordered the 32d MAU back into Lebanon to support the Lebanese Armed Forces where it was soon relieved by Camp Lejeune's 24th MAU. The 1st Battalion, 8th Marines Headquarters building was located at the Beirut International Airport and housed the Battalion Landing Team (BLT). From 27 September through 21 January 1983, two carriers were tethered to Lebanon to provide support for the Marine Corps forces ashore. On 11 February 1983, the response posture for carrier support was relaxed as the situation had stabilized. In February 1983, a small British contingent joined the U.S., French, and Italian MNF troops in Beirut.
On 17 May 1983, an agreement was signed by the representatives of Lebanon, Israel, and the United States that provided for Israeli withdrawal. Syria declined to discuss the withdrawal of its troops, effectively stalemating further progress.
The USMNF was initially successful; but, as the strategic and tactical situations changed, the peacekeepers came increasingly under fire. Opposition to the negotiations and to US support for the Gemayel regime led to a series of terrorist attacks in 1983 and 1984 on US interests, including the bombing on 18 April 1983 of the US embassy in west Beirut (63 dead), and of the US embassy annex in east Beirut on 20 September 1984 (8 killed).
Just before 6:30 a.m. on Oct. 23, 1983, a Mercedes truck passed a Lebanese checkpoint on the airport road without halting. The truck turned into the airport parking lot, circled twice and picked up speed for a deadly run at the headquarters building. Orders prohibited Marines from being locked and loaded, but small arms fire probably would not have made much difference, according to reports. A sentry did get some shots off with a pistol, however. The driver of the speeding van was determined to put a huge dent in the American presence in Lebanon. After breaking through several barriers, it sped between two sentry boxes and crashed through more obstacles, penetrating the building's first floor before detonating tons of explosives, taking the lives of 241 Marines, Sailors and soldiers, a majority of which were stationed at Camp Lejeune. Most died in their sleep or were crushed as the building collapsed, while a handful have died in the years that followed due to injuries sustained from the bombing.
On 3 December 1983, two F-14s flying over Lebanon were fired upon by Syrian antiaircraft artillery. On 4 December 1983, aircraft from Kennedy and Independence were launched against Syrian targets; two were shot down, and one U.S. airman was taken prisoner by Syrian troops.
The virtual collapse of the Lebanese army in February 1984, following the defection of many of its Muslim and Druze units to opposition militias, was a major blow to the government. As it became clear that the departure of the US Marines was imminent, the Gemayel Government came under increasing pressure from Syria and its Muslim Lebanese allies to abandon the May 17 accord. On 26 February 1984, the withdrawal of the USMC contingent of the international peacekeeping force was completed. The Lebanese Government announced on 05 March 1984 that it was canceling its unimplemented agreement with Israel.
... More
Memories The Indy BG spent a lot of time supporting Ambassador Habib's "shuttle diplomacy" in and out of BeirThe Indy BG spent a lot of time supporting Ambassador Habib's "shuttle diplomacy" in and out of Beirut and Israel. He came to the carrier on several occasions.
The carrier stayed on "Bagel Station" (eastern Med) most of the cruise as part of the Multinational Force Lebanon. The Multinational Force in Lebanon (MNF) was an international peacekeeping force created in August 1982 following the 1981 U.S.-brokered ceasefire between the PLO and Israel to end their involvement in the conflict between Lebanon's pro-government and pro-Syrian factions. The ceasefire held until June 3, 1982 when the PLO attempted to assassinate Shlomo Argov, Israel's ambassador to London. Three days later, Israel reentered the PLO-controlled West Beirut and blockaded the city in order to contain insurgency. Seven weeks into the blockade, the besieged PLO acceded to a new agreement for their withdrawal. The agreement provided for the deployment of a Multinational Force to assist the Lebanese Armed Forces in evacuating the PLO, Syrian forces and other foreign combatants involved in Lebanon's civil war. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1981-1988/lebanon... More
Criteria
The Navy "E" Ribbon denotes permanent duty on ships or in squadrons that won the battle efficiency competition after July 1, 1974.
Description VAW-122 Steeljaws
The Battle Efficiency Ribbon, Navy "E" Ribbon, or (informally) the Battle "E" ribbon was established in July 1976 by Secretary of the Navy J. William Middendorf. The Navy "E" Ribbon d... VAW-122 Steeljaws
The Battle Efficiency Ribbon, Navy "E" Ribbon, or (informally) the Battle "E" ribbon was established in July 1976 by Secretary of the Navy J. William Middendorf. The Navy "E" Ribbon denotes permanent duty on U.S. Navy ships, aviation squadrons, or units (including construction battalions) that have won a battle efficiency competition (Battle "E") after July 1, 1974. The Navy "E" is one of the Naval service awards that does not have a corresponding medal, meaning that when in full dress (when medals are worn), the Navy "E" is placed above the right breast pocket of the uniform instead of the left. However, when in standard uniform (no medals are worn), the ribbon is placed above the left breast pocket, along with all other citations and awards. The "E" is also one of the few ribbons that is not an individual award. Instead, it is a unit award, issued to any U.S. serviceman or woman who is stationed as ship's company, aviation squadron complement, construction battalion complement, or other similarly-sized deployable/sea-going naval combat unit who is assigned to the unit when the award is earned. MoreHide
Criteria The Navy Expeditionary Medal is awarded to Navy personnel who have landed on foreign territory and engaged in operations against armed opposition or who have operated under circumstances deemed to mer... The Navy Expeditionary Medal is awarded to Navy personnel who have landed on foreign territory and engaged in operations against armed opposition or who have operated under circumstances deemed to merit special recognition and for which no campaign medal has been awarded. MoreHide
Description Assigned VAW-122, IO-MED Cruise Nov 1980-June 1981.
BACKGROUND:
"The medal will be awarded," reads the Orders, "to the officers and enlisted men of the Navy who shall have actually landed on foreign ter... Assigned VAW-122, IO-MED Cruise Nov 1980-June 1981.
BACKGROUND:
"The medal will be awarded," reads the Orders, "to the officers and enlisted men of the Navy who shall have actually landed on foreign territory and engaged in operations against armed opposition, or operated under circumstances which, after full consideration, shall be deemed to merit special recognition and for which service no campaign medal has been awarded. Additional awards of the Navy Expeditionary Medal are denoted by service stars. MoreHide
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Description The Iran hostage crisis was a diplomatic standoff between Iran and the United States. Fifty-two American diplomats and citizens were held hostage for 444 days from November 4, 1979, to January 20, 198The Iran hostage crisis was a diplomatic standoff between Iran and the United States. Fifty-two American diplomats and citizens were held hostage for 444 days from November 4, 1979, to January 20, 1981 after a group of Iranian students belonging to the Muslim Student Followers of the Imam's Line, who supported the Iranian Revolution, took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. It stands as the longest hostage crisis in recorded history.
The crisis was described by the Western media as an “entanglement” of “vengeance and mutual incomprehension.” President Jimmy Carter called the hostages “victims of terrorism and anarchy” and said, “The United States will not yield to blackmail.” In Iran, it was widely seen as a blow against the United States and its influence in Iran, including its perceived attempts to undermine the Iranian Revolution and its longstanding support of the recently overthrown Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had led an autocratic regime.
After his overthrow in 1979, the Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was purportedly admitted to the United States for cancer treatment. Iran demanded that he be returned to stand trial for crimes he was accused of committing during his reign. Specifically, Pahlavi was accused of committing crimes against Iranian citizens with the help of his secret police, the SAVAK. Iranians saw the decision to grant him asylum as American complicity in those atrocities. The Americans saw the hostage-taking as an egregious violation of the principles of international law, which granted diplomats immunity from arrest and made diplomatic compounds inviolable.
The crisis reached a climax when, after failed efforts to negotiate the hostages’ release, the United States military attempted a rescue operation using ships, including the USS Nimitz and USS Coral Sea, that were patrolling the waters near Iran. On April 24, 1980, the attempt, known as Operation Eagle Claw, failed, resulting in the deaths of eight American servicemen and one Iranian civilian, as well as the destruction of two aircraft.
Shah Pahlavi left the United States in December 1979 and was ultimately granted asylum in Egypt, where he died from complications of cancer on July 27, 1980. In September 1980, the Iraqi military invaded Iran, beginning the Iran–Iraq War. These events led the Iranian government to enter negotiations with the U.S., with Algeria acting as a mediator. The hostages were formally released into United States custody the day after the signing of the Algiers Accords, just minutes after the new American president, Ronald Reagan, was sworn into office.
The crisis is considered a pivotal episode in the history of Iran–United States relations. Political analysts cite it as a major factor in the trajectory of Jimmy Carter’s presidency and his loss in the 1980 presidential election. In Iran, the crisis strengthened the prestige of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and the political power of theocrats who opposed any normalization of relations with the West. The crisis also led to the United States’ economic sanctions against Iran, further weakening ties between the two countries.... More
Memories I was an officer candidate, Class 19-79, at Aviation Officer Candidate School (AOCS) when the 52 Am I was an officer candidate, Class 19-79, at Aviation Officer Candidate School (AOCS) when the 52 Americans were taken hostage at the embassy in Tehran on November 4, 1979. I was a student at the Armed Forces Air Intelligence Training Center (AFAITC), Lowry AFB in Denver, CO when the US failed in its atttempt to rescue the hostages (Operation Eagle Claw) on April 24, 1980. I was onstation in the North Arabian Sea (NAS) with VAW-122 Steeljaws aboard USS Independence (CV-62) when Ronald Reagan was sworn in as our 40th president on January 20, 1981 and the hostages released minutes later! We soon turned south for our first port call in Perth, Australia!!!
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis... More
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Description IO MED Cruise with VAW-122 onboard USS Independence.
A Sea Service Ribbon is an award of the United States Navy, United States Marine Corps, United States Coast Guard, the United States Army, and the N... IO MED Cruise with VAW-122 onboard USS Independence.
A Sea Service Ribbon is an award of the United States Navy, United States Marine Corps, United States Coast Guard, the United States Army, and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration which recognizes those service members who have performed military duty while stationed on a United States Navy, Coast Guard, Army, or NOAA vessel at sea and/or members of the Navy, Marine Corps or Coast Guard who have been forward-deployed with their home unit.
Additional awards of the Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, Naval Reserve Sea Service Ribbon, Coast Guard Sea Service Ribbon, Army Sea Duty Ribbon, and NOAA Corps Sea Service Deployment Ribbon are denoted by bronze and/or silver service stars on the ribbon.
The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon (SSDR) is a service award of the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps which was authorized in May 1980[4] and retroactively authorized to 15 August 1974, coinciding with a temporary suspension in authority for award of the National Defense Service Medal between that date and 2 August 1990. It was the first type of sea service ribbon established in the U.S. Armed Forces.
The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is granted to any member of the U.S. Navy or U.S. Marine Corps assigned to a deployable unit (e.g., a ship (including submarines), aircraft squadron, air wing or air group, detachment, battalion, Marine Expeditionary Unit, Marine Air Ground Task Force, or other unit type that operates away from its assigned homeport) and is forward-deployed for a period of either 90 consecutive days or two periods of at least 80 days each within a given 12-month period; or 6 months stationed overseas in a forward deployed location. Staffs of embarked Destroyer Squadrons (DESRONs), Amphibious Squadrons (PHIBRONs), Amphibious Readiness Groups (ARG), Expeditionary Strike Groups (ESGs), Carrier Strike Groups (CSGs) and similar units deployed within time period requirements are also eligible for award. A 3/16 inch bronze star is awarded for the second through the fifth award of the ribbon; the 3/16-inch silver star will be worn in lieu of five 3/16-inch bronze stars.
When a ship's crew qualifies for the Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, the ship is authorized to paint and display the ribbon and award stars on the port and starboard side of the bulwark aft to designate the number of deployments conducted throughout the commissioned life of the ship since August 1974.
MoreHide
Worst Moment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=415HQ1t2ZNI
Instructors
SSGT Mace and SSGT McDaniel, USMC
Other Memories
19-79 was an end of fiscal year class so recruiters were trying to make numbers. 60 started at day one and a few months later only 28 received a commission. The DIs ran us through both the obstacle and the cross country courses back to back on day one to cut down the size of the class. Maybe 13 went immediately ot some kind of hold to a follow-on class. Several DOR'd on the final day. One believed that he wouldn't get enough flight hours. Another was facing divorce he accepted his commission.
Commander: Gen Brian. D. Brown
Deputy Commander: VADM Eric T. Olson
Director, Center for Special Operations: LtGen Dell .L. Dailey
Director for Intelligence/J2: COL Dan Daley
In 2005, USSOCOM was directed by the Unified Command Plan to plan, synchronize, and as directed, conduct global operations against terror networks in cooordination with other combatant commanders. Everyday we collaborated, coordinated and planned with other agencies to achieve desired global effects. The most comprehensive element of SOCOM’s synchronization effort was the global collaborative planning process. This effort drew on the other Combatant Command capabilities and expertise to develop DoD’s global war on terror campaign plan.
LOM Award
For exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service as Director of Intelligence Operations Division, Center for Special Operations, United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), MacDi11 Air Force Base, Florida from August 2004 through May 2006. Captain Knight's driving leadership of more than 125 intelligence personnel was directly responsible for the development of three groundbreaking intelligence annexes to Operational and Contingency Plans, clearly establishing USSOCOM as the global intelligence synchronizer. He brilliantly led his Division through six Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) exercises, including several demanding time sensitive planning scenarios that proved critical to articulating USSOCOM' s GWOT roles for intelligence. Additionally, Captain Knight pioneered USSOCOM' s GWOT personnel requirements plan supporting an unprecedented increase of more than 300 personnel critical to USSOCOM's GWOT mission. His superior performance of duties highlights the culmination of 26 years of honorable and dedicated service. Captain Knight' s dynamic direction, keen judgment, and loyal dedication to duty reflected great credit upon him and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.